La p谩gina que intenta visitar s贸lo est谩 disponible en ingl茅s. 隆Disculpa!
The page you are about to visit is currently only available in English. Sorry!
Confession: I don鈥檛 make checklists while birding. I admit this with some guilt, because I know that birders鈥 observations fuel community science and conservation action. But I鈥檝e worried that collecting data while birding would make it feel clinical. Recently, though, I鈥檝e come to see things differently. I鈥檝e found that quantifying my experience in crea颅tive ways can enrich my time in the field. Data can be鈥攇asp鈥攆un.
鈥淢ost of us, as birders, are collect颅ing data,鈥 says Jer Thorp, a writer, data artist, and frequent checklister. But counting species, he says, is just the beginning. In an online class Thorp teaches on , one of his favorite assignments directs students to find a nice spot and stay put for an hour. From there, it鈥檚 up to them to chronicle their observations however they like鈥攅xcept with a traditional checklist.
鈥淒ata is just what you decide to pay attention to,鈥 says Mikko Jimenez, an urban ecologist who took Thorp鈥檚 class while complet颅ing his Ph.D. at Colorado State University. With this anything-goes perspective, the options are endless: You could track squabbles at your feeder or how often American Robins pluck worms from the dirt. You could chart your local park鈥檚 winter soundscape, marking each time you hear nuthatches, chickadees, and crows. You could even forget about identification and spend a morning recording all the feather colors you see.
What you do with your data is equally limitless. Thorp鈥檚 students have crafted origami sculptures to represent species鈥 conservation status and sent postcards to friends and family with hand-drawn graphs about their bird encounters. 鈥淒ata is not a thing that we usually think about as carrying love,鈥 Thorp says鈥攂ut why couldn鈥檛 it be?
Getting inventive can also help entice new birders, Jimenez says. Rather than barrage newbies with names and numbers, set aside the checklist and try drawing your friends鈥 focus to, say, all the strange sounds that birds are making around them. 鈥淚 think that makes birding a lot more interesting and accessible to people,鈥 he says.
And if you are a lister, you already have a rich data resource to explore. Why not try plotting all your sightings of a favorite species on a timeline or a map? If you want to go further, you can download data from many community science platforms, including 探花精选鈥檚 Christmas Bird Count and your own eBird account. But you don鈥檛 need any computing power to start experimenting with birding data, just your interest and an open mind.
I took Thorp鈥檚 course this past spring, and it helped me to pay attention to birds in an entirely new fashion. I still don鈥檛 keep a life list, but thinking differently about data has changed how I approach birding. Each time I head to the park I ask myself: What do I want to admire today? And I let my curiosity lead the way.
Shift your perspective with these low-tech data ideas.
Observe: Choose a few species with distinct-looking males and females (think Northern Cardinal, Mallard, House Finch) and classify all the individuals you see over the course of a morning: Male, Female, or Can鈥檛 Tell. Do you observe an even split? Does the ratio vary by species?
Illustrate: Draw a set of stacked bar charts or pie charts.
Analyze: Repeat the experiment throughout the year to see if proportions shift. Now that you鈥檙e paying attention, does it get harder to tell the sexes apart at certain times of year? Can you observe any differences in behavior between males and females?
Observe: For an hour (or however long you choose), sit in one spot and see how close birds get to you, noting their species and making your best estimate of distance. Monitor every direction around you, including overhead.
Illustrate: Plot your data on a number line or with overlapping circles.
Analyze: How did tracking proximity change your experience of birding? Do any factors besides literal distance, like size or rarity, affect how close a bird 鈥渇eels鈥 to you? Repeat the experiment all by ear, estimating distances based on bird vocalizations.
Observe: Become your own subject and track your joy! Start a timer and bird for an hour. Each time you see or hear a bird, record the time, species, and your own rating of the spike of delight the observation gives you (a scale of 10 works well).
Illustrate: Make a simple ranking from most to least joy-inducing or a timeline of your peaks and valleys throughout the hour.
Analyze: What really brought you the most bliss? Was it the species itself, or did the setting factor into your response? Collect more data: Does hearing the bird sing increase your颅 颅delight rating? Do perched birds stir your heart as much as soaring ones? Try the exercise with a friend and compare your results.
This story originally ran in the Winter 2025 issue as 鈥淣umbers Game.鈥 To receive our print magazine, become a member by .