La p谩gina que intenta visitar s贸lo est谩 disponible en ingl茅s. 隆Disculpa!
The page you are about to visit is currently only available in English. Sorry!
At the bottom of the earth, aboard an expedition ship crossing the rocky waters of the Drake Passage between Argentina and Antarctica, might be giving a lecture on seabirds that begins with the poem 鈥.鈥 It鈥檚 the haunting story of a sailor who kills an albatross and is forced to endure supernatural punishment at sea, ultimately learning a hard lesson about humanity鈥檚 responsibility to the world.
鈥淚t鈥檚 a very good allegory of the relationship between man and the environment,鈥 Tapia says, pointing to the moment when the albatross is senselessly executed鈥斺渢his blessing of nature ends鈥濃攁nd everything changes. 鈥淭hat鈥檚 the spirit of that poem, really,鈥 Tapia says. 鈥淭he relationship between man and nature and how 鈥 in the end, the guy realizes his mistake.鈥
For Tapia, poetry helps bridge emotional understanding and scientific knowledge during his lectures. 鈥淭hat's the beauty of literature,鈥 he says. 鈥淭hat's why I like to use it as an opening, because it immediately underlines the relationship between us and [birds].鈥 (Side note: Tapia first discovered the poem in school after hearing the Iron Maiden song with the same name.)
On the other side of the globe, in Alaska, where birds are also abundant and vulnerable to rapid environmental change, that layered understanding is especially important, and Alaska writers are here to drive that point home. Alaska鈥檚 prose and poetry are powerful tools for deepening understanding of birds鈥攏ot only as ecological indicators but also as family, teachers, and storytellers themselves. Across forms and traditions, writing about birds in Alaska is a cherished pastime鈥攁nd very much a current thing.
Countless Alaskan poets and authors focus on birds as subjects. But there鈥檚 more to this relationship. For , Alaska鈥檚 State Writer Laureate (who鈥檚 also a journalist, playwright, and TV writer who鈥檚 been nominated for her work on 鈥淢olly of Denali鈥), birds are inseparable from personhood. In her work, shaped by Tlingit storytelling traditions, birds are not just metaphors; they are kin.
鈥淭hey鈥檙e our relatives, they鈥檙e our cousins, they鈥檙e our creators in some cases, and that鈥檚 probably why we like writing about them so much,鈥 Starbard says. 鈥淭hey're such a huge part of our identity, in a way that I don't think is reflected in many other places. I think birds are treated as animals who have no relation to us, and we just have such a deep connection with them that they show up in everything we do.鈥 (Another side note: Starbard is saying this while two decorative birds are literally right behind her head in her home on Douglas Island in Juneau.)
This perspective frames how birds appear in Starbard鈥檚 writing, seeing as ravens, eagles, and other species carry lineage.
鈥淩aven is my moiety as a Tlingit woman, and all Tlingit follow their mother鈥檚 clan to be either Raven or Eagle. It is part of my identity as Leeneidi to be Raven, as well as T鈥檃kdeintaan yadi鈥攖he daughter of the Seagull (or Kittiwake) clan, meaning my father鈥檚 clan,鈥 she says. 鈥淚 couldn鈥檛 separate those identities from myself even if I wanted to, so birds have always been a part of my upbringing, as well as a cultural cornerstone of the Tlingit people.鈥
Starbard is part of a broader community of Alaska Native writers whose work deeply engages with the land and birds. She鈥檚 quick to mention poets like , , and .
鈥淎ll three poets write their birds as 鈥榗haracters,鈥欌 Starbard says, but Twitchell鈥攁 Tlingit/Haida/Yup鈥檌k/Sami scholar and writer鈥攑ublishes works highlighting the legends and personhood behind these birds. 鈥淩aven/Trickster is as human as any human, sometimes more so,鈥 Starbard says. 鈥淚鈥檝e learned a lot about our culture, including birds, from him.鈥 The piece 鈥淭he Many Cycles of Raven鈥 from 鈥淕瘫agaan X瘫始usyee / Below the Foot of the Sun鈥 comes recommended.
Wenstrup鈥檚 writing explores personal history and nature, referencing birds in pieces about legend and as a strong relation to her identity, Starbard explains. Wenstrup is a Dena鈥檌na poet whose debut collection, 鈥淭he Museum of Unnatural Histories,鈥 was released in 2025. A recommended piece is 鈥淕gugguyni in the Museum Parking Lot鈥 about Ggugguyni (the Dena'ina Raven) and The Museum Curator (the narrator) collecting discarded French fries 鈥 and secrets.
Kane鈥檚 poetry is deeply rooted in Arctic landscapes and Inupiaq heritage, as she has family ties to Ugiuvak and Qawiaraq. Her work frequently reflects on birds, often as symbols, sometimes accompanied by legend. Starbard suggests her collection, The Cormorant Hunter鈥檚 Wife, for fans of Alaska poetry with heavy bird nods (for obvious reasons).
Across these writers, birds are not just scenery; they are personalities and are often central to how a story unfolds. Sounds like we all have some reading to do!
Outside of Fairbanks, approaches writing about birds through observation that he shapes into narratives. A longtime adventurer, anthropologist, educator (as a secondary school teacher in four Alaska Native villages in the lower Yukon Delta), and poet (he鈥檚 the author of 鈥淰oices on the Wind,鈥 an entire poetry book about Alaska birds), Keim鈥檚 writing blends science with experiences and poetic form. Over several decades, Keim says he organized about 40 long-distance hiking and canoeing trips in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and the Gates of Arctic National Park, and wrote about the wildlife鈥攊ncluding birds鈥攈e encountered in those landscapes.
鈥淏irds, since they sang and flew and mated and nested among all of the wildflowers and grizzly bears and caribou of those wild areas and were part of everything we did, every minute of every precious day of our presence up there, became the most memorable part of camping and trekking everywhere there,鈥 he says.
Keim sees poetry as a vital connection between science and the inspiration to protect. While data and policy are essential, he argues that storytelling creates the emotional connection necessary for stewardship. The 鈥渆motional quality of story poems鈥 allows readers to engage more deeply with issues like habitat loss and shifting bird populations, making complex environmental realities more accessible and personal.
鈥淔or those who may read my poems, my hope is that they will at least have a deeper emotional connection with what I have written about,鈥 he says. 鈥淚n that way, perhaps they will be motivated to learn more about nature and the many ways they could actively try to protect what鈥檚 left, including the wild animals and wild places of both Alaska and the Earth in general. This is what I would call true wilderness stewardship.鈥
But Keim has even more actionable advice: 鈥淐amp, trek, canoe, cross-country ski, and raft in wild country and volunteer to participate in nature research studies and student programs that emphasize the intimate relationships that people have, and could have, with wild nature,鈥 he says.
One last thing. Keim鈥檚 work, including 鈥淰oices on the Wind,鈥 is driven by a belief that birds are expressive beings with their own forms of communication. He says ornithologists, ethologists, and naturalists鈥攆rom classical Greek Theophrastus to modern-day Frans de Waal鈥攈ave emphasized that birds and other non-human animals have their own unique sentience, intelligence, and consciousness, including 11,000 different ways of expressing themselves through behaviors like their calls and songs.
鈥淏ird species evolution is much more ancient than our own, dating from as far back as the Jurassic and Cretaceous periods in Earth鈥檚 paleo history,鈥 he says. 鈥淪o why should we not expect them to be more fully evolved in their own behavior domains than we humans are?鈥
With that in mind, perhaps it鈥檚 not too crazy to think that birds are creating poetry about us, too.
We鈥檙e going back to Starbard, who says that the Indigenous people of Alaska have been capturing its beauty, but also the responsibility of living here, for millennia now. In this way, poetry and prose become tools not just for appreciation, but for responsibility.
鈥淭he cultural stories and the art capturing the stories, heavily featuring birds by the way, teach how we live with this beauty, and its often frightening changeability, in a way that emphasizes our lived place and duties amongst all the creatures of our land, not any perceived power over them, and not just as picturesque postcards to look at.鈥
For many outside Alaska, birds are part of the state鈥檚 visual allure: You got eagles soaring over mountains, puffins perched on cliffs, cranes crossing open skies. But Alaska writers consistently push beyond that surface.
鈥淚 don鈥檛 think we need to sell Alaska as a beautiful place to visit; people know that already,鈥 Starbard says. Instead, her work鈥攁nd the work of many Alaska writers mentioned in this story and beyond鈥攆ocuses on deepening understanding, creating relationships, and being good stewards, which can often be complex.
Starbard says she has a complicated relationship with the word 鈥渃onservation,鈥 because it too often means 鈥渞emoved from the land.鈥 鈥淚 think that's the opposite of what we need to be able to save our land and save our environments,鈥 she says. 鈥淲e need to connect with them. We need to see the importance. We need to hold it in our hands to be able to value it. And if we're removed from it, we're only ever going to see it as this Mona Lisa behind the glass.鈥
Her new book addresses this concept. follows Emmett, a 12-year-old Tlingit boy who has never been to Alaska, but is about to spend the summer in S铆t' Eeti Geiy铆, or Glacier Bay National Park鈥攖he homeland of his mother鈥檚 people. Spoiler alert, but Emmett has a bad interaction with an ornithologist, who may not have the most respect for people 鈥渋n nature.鈥 However, Emmett learns to look at this person in a different way over their mutual respect for the birds and creatures of Alaska.
This middle-grade novel is another example of how Alaskan authors can underscore the miracle of Alaska鈥檚 birds and landscapes while inspiring a desire to protect them.
鈥淲riting, whether it's poetry or a TV show, and showing the beauty and ugliness and extraordinary miracle of what we call the natural world鈥攂ut we're part of it; it's just the world鈥 that's how we bring about empathy for our causes.鈥